Legal Opinion · Dissent

Haspray v. Pasarelli

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1963No. 4559Published

1DissentThompson, J.

A contract for the sale of land shall be void unless the contract, or some note or memorandum thereof, expressing the consideration, be in writing and subscribed by the party by whom the sale is to be made. NRS 111.210. Whether the “writing” required by the statute is legally sufficient presents a question of law. The court to whom the written memorandum is submitted, looks to the writing alone to decide its adequacy. Resort to oral or parol evidence is not authorized for the purpose of providing essential terms.

*210In Stanley v. Levy & Zentner Co., 60 Nev. 432, 446, 112 P.2d 1047, 1053, 158…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. KlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Craig v. ZelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Montanaro v. PandolfiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  4. Stanley v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Johnson v. WatsonNevada Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API