Legal Opinion

Garner v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 20, 2009No. 07-525CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EMILY C. HEWITT, Judge.

I. Background

Plaintiffs in this action are employees of the United States of America (United States or government or defendant) employed by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as “Diversion Investigators.” Complaint (Compl.) 111. On July 13, 2007 plaintiffs filed them Complaint in this court, “seeking] to recover from defendant back pay, liquidated damages, interest, attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 [ (FLSA) ], as amended, 29 U.S.C. [§§ 201-219].” Id. Plaintiffs allege that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. CokeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Atlas Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tigerswan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Crusan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. McCann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Gonzalez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Cebe Farms, Ind. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API