Florida Power & Light Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*481OPINION
YOCK, Senior Judge.
This action, in which the plaintiffs assert four theories of recovery based upon an alleged breach of contract by the Government, is presently before the Court on the defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. For the reasons stated below, the defendant’s motion is granted, and the plaintiffs’ Complaint is to be dismissed.
Background1
Prior to September 1, 1992, each of the seven plaintiffs2 entered into a Utility Services Contract with the United States, pursuant to which the plaintiffs agreed to purchase fixed percentages of their enriched uranium needs from…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- BLR Group of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.