Legal Opinion

Southern California Edison Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 2, 1999No. Nos. 96-104 C, 96-103 CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION*

WIESE, Judge.

The question we address in this case is whether the Government correctly determined the refund amount due to plaintiff as its share of excess revenues collected from plaintiff and other public utility companies in connection with the sale of electricity at the Hoover Dam. The issue is now before us on cross-motions for summary judgment that have been fully briefed and argued by the parties. We conclude that the methodology employed by the Government in determining the amount of refund due plaintiff was contrary to the applicable regulations, and resulted in an incorrect…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. West 14th Street Commercial Corp. v. 5 West 14th Owners Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southern California Edison Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. North Star Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. North Star Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Avocent Redmond Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Southern California Edison Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API