Legal Opinion
Feliciano v. City of Cleveland
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 12, 1987No. Civ. A. C85-3356PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Raul Feliciano, Jr. and Richard Rojas filed this action on November 13, 1985, after resigning from the cadet class of the City of Cleveland Police Department. Their lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of the drug testing by urinalysis administered during their last week of peace officer training, which they maintain violated their rights under the fourth, fifth and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution. Named as defendants are former Safety Director Reginald M. Turner and former Chief of Police William T.…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Feliciano v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Feliciano v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. BurnleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Egloff v. New Jersey Air National GuardDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.