Legal Opinion

Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Burnley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1988No. 85-2891PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

The Railway Labor Executives’ Association1 and various railway labor organizations which are constituent members (collectively “RLEA”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the government. RLEA challenges the constitutionality of Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) regulations mandating blood and urine tests of employees after certain train accidents and fatal incidents, and authorizing breath and urine tests after certain accidents, incidents and rule violations. RLEA also argues that the regulations violate provisions of the Railway Labor Act, the…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. Richard J. Leary, and F.L. Kleinberg & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. IsomCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Maria Piroglu v. T.R. Coleman, Individually and as Fire Chief, District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. Warren H. Rushton and David L. Lostroh v. Nebraska Public Power District, Don E. Schaufelberger, and Lawrence G. KunclCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API