Legal Opinion
Feliciano v. City of Cleveland
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 16, 1993No. Nos. 92-3015, 92-3096PublishedCited by 193 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, a group of former cadets in the City of Cleveland’s (“City”) police academy, appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment against them in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). The plaintiffs contend that the City violated their Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures and that the City and several Cleveland police officers and employees violated their Fourteenth Amendment right to substantive due process when the defendants subjected the plaintiffs to a surprise drug test while…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- Jane Doe v. Claiborne County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Kathy Davison v. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota Rocco Forte, in His Individual and Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Fagan v. City of VinelandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Joseph J. O'Brien v. City of Grand Rapids William Hegarty Daniel OstapowiczCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Waters v. City of MorristownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.