Legal Opinion
Solis v. VALLAR
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1999No. A088082PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARRILLI, J.
Consolacion P. Solis moves to dismiss an appeal by Edgardo P. Vallar from an order confirming a partition sale under Code of Civil Procedure section 873.750. Solis contends the order is not appealable, relying on Hummel v. First National Bank (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 489, 493 [236 Cal.Rptr. 449]. We conclude Hummel was wrong on this point; both statutory and case law support the appealability of an order entered under section 873.750. Solis also argues that Vallar lacks standing to appeal. This claim has no merit. We deny the motion, and in view of that disposition we also…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Butte Creek Island Ranch v. CrimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Dunn v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Barnes v. Litton Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. StarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Sullivan v. DorsaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Taylor v. Forde CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021