Dunn v. Dunn
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to confirm a sale of real estate. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
in partition. Thomas F. Dunn, in his lifetime, brought the action, November 29, 1897, praying partition of certain real property situated in the city of San Francisco; issue was joined, the cause tried by the court, and on March 21, 1898, an interlocutory decree was duly made and entered, adjudging that the then plaintiff and defendants Lawrence, William, Cornelius, and Henry Dunn, and I. H. Jacobs were tenants in common of the property, and defining their several interests therein; that defendant Mullen began an action in 1896 against Cornelius for six thousand dollars, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Howell v. . MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Hammond v. CailleaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Lefevre v. LarawayNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- Roudabush v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1879
- Allen v. MartinMississippi Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by12 opinions
- Andrada v. KelseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Schoonover v. BirnbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- In Re McLure's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Sullivan v. DorsaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.