Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Cooney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 17, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 9, 2000, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

*821Claimant was discharged from his employment as a mechanic for violating the employer’s safety rules. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he was terminated due to misconduct. Claimant appeals and we affirm. Substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant engaged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of LugoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of FrazierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re the Claim of SheehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of DaoustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re Stiefvater Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API