In re the Claim of Roman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 2, 1999, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was terminated from his employment as a general manager for a food service when, after receiving a written warning, he again left an office safe in the “day lock” position in violation of the employer’s policy. Given claimant’s demonstrated failure to comply with the employer’s established policies and procedures and the circumstances…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Claim of DerianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of CooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of BolasnyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of OrlandoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of BrennanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003