Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Daoust
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 20, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant, a truck driver, was discharged by his employer for his alleged involvement in the theft of some chainsaws he was tasked with delivering to a customer. In connection with this incident, claimant was later arrested and charged with criminal *829possession of stolen property in the third degree, a class D felony. Claimant pleaded guilty to the reduced…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Claim of HugginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of PetrosovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of CooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of ZegarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009