Legal Opinion

Fremont Compensation Insurance v. Hartnett

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1993No. B061496PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), J.

These consolidated actions arising from automobile-pedestrian accident were tried by the court. Judgment was in favor of the injured person, plaintiff and respondent Lisandro Ramirez Azucena, and in favor of plaintiff and respondent Fremont Compensation Insurance Company, which paid workers’ compensation benefits to Azucena on behalf of Azucena’s employer. The judgment, in the total amount of $80,000, was against the three defendants jointly and severally, Leonard Sapp, Karen Sapp, and Mary Hartnett. Although notice of appeal was filed on behalf of all three…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Maloney v. RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Benton v. SlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Showa Shipping Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Taylor v. Roseville Toyota, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Ghezavat v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API