Legal Opinion

Beverly Hills Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Martin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 17, 1939No. 28428PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county on April 8, 1937, by L. J. Martin, as plaintiff, against Charles A. Bliss and the Beverly Hills National Bank & Trust Company, a corporation, with its principal place of business located in California, as defendants. The action was one of interpleader in which the plaintiff alleged his possession of 125 shares of stock of the Moore Oil Company and asserted the existence of conflicting claims thereto by the defendants. The stock formerly belonged to Cora Bliss Funk, who died on the 5th day of January, 1937.

The defendants filed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Balduff Et Ux. v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Worley, Receiver v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Taylor v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Emery v. VillinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Penny v. VoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. Feagin v. ChampionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Modern Woodmen of America, Camp. No. 6967 v. Tulsa Modern Woodmen Bldg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Looney v. Bruin Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Republic Financial Corp. v. MizeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API