Legal Opinion

Emery v. Villines

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 18, 1935No. 23511PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This action was originally commenced in the superior court of Pottawatomie county by John VV. Yilllnes and his wife, Minnie C. Villines, against the Tecum-seli National Bank. John W. Villines has since died and the bank lias become insolvent and a receiver appointed. This cause has been revived in the name of the above administratrix, and the appeal is prosecuted by the bank’s receiver.

Hereinafter the plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant, and the defendants in error as plaintiffs, as (hoy appeared at the trial.

Plaintiffs allege, in substance, that in the year 1923, John W.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Voris v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Wagg v. HerbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Worley, Receiver v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Renas v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Taylor v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. McCullough v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Werfelman v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API