Ridgley v. Mooney
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom the Bartholomew Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.
The only error complained of in this case is the alleged error of sustaining the demurrer to the appellant’s amended complaint. The complaint alleges, in substance, that on the 26th day of October, 1892, the plaintiff and defendants entered into a written agreement, a copy of which is filed with the complaint, by the terms of which the plaintiff was to furnish the defendants with 500 cords of 128 cubic feet, or 2,400 pounds each, of prime chestnut bark, to be peeled during the spring of 1893, and straightly and solidly loaded in cars and consigned and delivered to defendants at Columbus,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- E. B. Waples & Co. v. H. C. Overaker & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
- Dwiggins v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Holland v. ReaMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Shipps v. AtkinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gaar, Scott & Co. v. FleshmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Dill v. MumfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Gardner v. CaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. WalshIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Meyer v. GreenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.