Dill v. Mumford
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom the Lawrence Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
— The complaint of the appellees against the appellant contained two paragraphs, a demurrer to each of which, for want of sufficient facts was overruled. Issues of fact were formed, and upon the trial thereof by jury there was a general verdict for the appellees in the sum of $134.18.
The first paragraph of the complaint was in the form of a common count for goods sold and delivered, with a bill of particulars. The sufficiency of the first paragraph is not questioned in argument before us, but we are required to examine the second paragraph. It was alleged in this paragraph, in substance, that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dwiggins v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Fell v. MullerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Shipps v. AtkinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Redmond v. SmockIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gaar, Scott & Co. v. FleshmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Moss v. Sugar Ridge TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- American Plate Glass Co. v. NicosonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Gardner v. CaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Kilmer v. Moneyweight Scale Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1905
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.