Legal Opinion
Dwiggins v. Clark
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 1884No. 11,067PublishedCited by 24 opinions
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Black, C.
The appellee sued the appellant upon a written contract as follows:
“Milton Clark, Crawfordsville, Ind., agent for the White Bronze Monuments, manufactured at Bridgeport, Conn.. JuPe 24th, 1881. Wayne township, Montgomery county, Ind. Order and agreement for double front white bronze monument, No. 155, to be delivered at Waynetown in August, 1881, or as soon as convenient after it arrives here.
“ I hereby agree, for value received, to pay Milton Clark' or bearer four hundred and fifty dollars on delivery of one-No. 155 white bronze monument, in accordance with the description of said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dustan v. . McAndrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Cahen v. . PlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Hayden v. . DemetsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Fell v. MullerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Lindley v. DempseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Moore v. SargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Gaar, Scott & Co. v. FleshmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Dill v. MumfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Rastetter v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Shipps v. AtkinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.