Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Fleshman
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Harrison Circuit Court; C. W. Cook, Judge. Action by Gaar, Scott & Co. against Andrew J. Flesh-man. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRoby, C. J.
A demurrer for want of facts was sustained to appellant’s amended complaint. It refused to plead further and appeals from the judgment thereupon *491rendered. The action is founded upon an instrument in writing, by which appellee ordered from appellant a certain machine, agreeing to receive the same, subject to the conditions of a printed warranty, to pay freig’ht and charges from Eichmond, Indiana, and to pay, by note, at the time and place of delivery, $463. It also contained stipulations as follows:
“Machinery to be loaded on cars at Eichmond, Indiana, on or about May 1, 1903, and shipped to A.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Smith v. BarberIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- White v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Dwiggins v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Fell v. MullerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Dill v. MumfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Guerrettaz v. Public Service Co. of Ind., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1949
- Van Sickle v. Kokomo Water Works Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Joint County Park Board v. StegemollerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Lebanon v. Public Service Co. of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Indianapolis Water Co. v. LuxIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.