Holland v. Rea
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.
Keith & Holland claimed that in January, 1877, they concluded an agreement with Pea & Hale, by which they, said Keith & Holland, were to furnish during that winter at or near Stony Point, on the shore of Lake St. Clair, in Ontario, at the rate of $3 per M. feet, 500 M. feet more or less of good sound elm logs of first-class quality and fourteen feet and a half in length and not less than eighteen inches in diameter; and that Pea & Hale were to take the logs so furnished and pay therefor in Canada currency or its equivalent in United States currency, that is to say, $500 down and the remainder…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Thompson v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Smith v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Flood v. . MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kearney Milling & Elevator Co. v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Indianapolis Cabinet Co. v. HerrmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Putnam v. GliddenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Ridgley v. MooneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Charnley v. SibleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.