Legal Opinion

Holland v. Rea

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1882PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.

Keith & Holland claimed that in January, 1877, they concluded an agreement with Pea & Hale, by which they, said Keith & Holland, were to furnish during that winter at or near Stony Point, on the shore of Lake St. Clair, in Ontario, at the rate of $3 per M. feet, 500 M. feet more or less of good sound elm logs of first-class quality and fourteen feet and a half in length and not less than eighteen inches in diameter; and that Pea & Hale were to take the logs so furnished and pay therefor in Canada currency or its equivalent in United States currency, that is to say, $500 down and the remainder…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Thompson v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Smith v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Flood v. . MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kearney Milling & Elevator Co. v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Indianapolis Cabinet Co. v. HerrmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Putnam v. GliddenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Ridgley v. MooneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Charnley v. SibleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API