Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Gearan

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 14, 1997No. Civil Action 96-1800(PLF)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINON

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

Jeffery C. Taylor brings this action under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e; 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and the equal protection and due process clauses of the United States Constitution; he also alleges various common law torts. At bottom, he challenges the Peace Corps’ conclusion that he is not medically qualified for a position as an overseas volunteer. Defendants have moved to dismiss on a variety of grounds or for summary judgment. 1

I. BACKGROUND

In 1992, plaintiff applied for a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moore v. MotzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Welsh v. HaglerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Baker v. Library of CongressDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  4. Mobern Electric Corp. v. WalshDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  5. Bowers v. JaneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API