Legal Opinion

Baker v. Library of Congress

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 24, 2003No. CIV.A. 99-2394(PLF)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL A. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Yeda Baker, proceeding pro se, initially brought this action for unfair labor practices under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Act, 5 U.S.C. § 7101 et seq. She also alleged a deprivation of due process. In addition, Ms. Baker asserted that she was subjected to national origin and gender discrimination, sexual harassment, a hostile work environment, and retaliation. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint as to all claims and to dismiss Donald L. Scott as a defendant.

In response, plaintiff filed a “Request for…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Wellington Mitchell v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Nichols v. TruscottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Brady v. LivingoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  3. Turner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  4. Prince v. RiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  5. Craig v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API