Legal Opinion

Moohr v. Victoria Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1927No. 20805. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the loss of services and the expenses for the care.of her minor son, caused by injuries sustained by him in consequence of falling into a passenger elevator shaft in an apartment house owned and operated by the defendant. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,750. The defendant moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial, both of which were overruled. Judgment was entered upon the verdict and the defendant appeals.

Thi…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Firebaugh v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Graaf v. Vulcan Iron WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Labee v. Sultan Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Jacobi v. Builders' Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Moohr v. Victoria Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haag v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Cash v. Otis Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Cash v. Otis Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API