Legal Opinion

Labee v. Sultan Logging Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1908No. 6769PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered January 12, 1907, setting aside a nonsuit and granting a new trial, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee through the' breaking of a cable.

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

Fullerton, J.

— This case is before us on rehearing. For the former opinion see LaBee v. Sultan Logging Co., 47 Wash. 57, 91 Pac. 560, where will be found a statement of the issues involved. In the petition for rehearing, as well as in the oral argument made at bar, it is insisted that the court erred in applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to a case between master and servant. It is contended that this doctrine is applicable only “to cases between carrier and passenger, and other cases wherein the person sought to be held occupies the relation of insurer,” but is never…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. McCarthy Dry Goods Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. LaBee v. Sultan Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wodnik v. Luna Park Amusement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Lynch v. Ninemire Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Graaf v. Vulcan Iron WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Penson v. Inland Empire Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Lewinn v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API