Cash v. Otis Elevator Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Sheehy
I concur in the result as to Mueller Apartments, but dissent from much of what is said with respect to Mueller *339Apartments, and dissent from the majority holding as to Otis:
I concur with the majority that Mueller Apartments raised no issue of material fact on which it had a right to a jury decision. There can be no conclusion of fact but that on the early morning of August 20, 1981, Mueller was in violation of the state building code, and its counterpart elevator code because of the defective condition of the brass door latch which was a part of the interlock system.
It necessarily follows that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Knight v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- Marsh v. AyersMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Tompkins v. Northwestern Union Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
- Brothers v. General Motors Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
- Moohr v. Victoria Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.