Legal Opinion

Haag v. Harris

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1935No. S. F. 15372PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action for personal injuries, sustained by plaintiff as a result of a fall into the elevator shaft of defendants’ apartment building. Plaintiff testified that he entered the building as a guest of one of the tenants, opened the .elevator door and fell into the shaft. The elevator was automatic and self-operating, and the doors had locks which were intended to make it impossible both to move the elevator from any floor until the door was closed, and to open the door when the elevator was not at the floor. Various witnesses for defendant, including an inspector of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barbieri v. LawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Jacobi v. Builders' Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Moohr v. Victoria Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Class v. Young Women's Christian Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Moohr v. Victoria Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Osborn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Parker v. Manchester Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Jones v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Begay v. LivingstonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API