Wallace v. H. W. Noble & Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Brown, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Newell B. Wallace against H. W. Noble & Company for breach of a contract for the sale of corporate stock. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract in the unlawful sale in April, 1915, by defendant of 20 shares of stock •of Ford Motor Company, Ltd., of Canada. From a judgment in the sum of $3,500 in favor of the plaintiff the case is brought here by writ of error. The trial judge in overruling a motion for a new trial made so complete a statement of the issues involved that we quote therefrom as follows:
“This was an action of assumpsit brought in the summer of 1915 by Newell B. Wallace against H. W. Noble & Company, a corporation, for damages for the breach of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Galigher v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Wright v. . Bank of the MetropolisNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- McKinley v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Coffey v. McGaheyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Wilson v. Colorado Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shaw v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Mitchell v. Reolds Farms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Farrell v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Sanderson v. BarkmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Holland Furnace Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.