Sanderson v. Barkman
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
This case has been here before. Sanderson v. Barkman, 264 Mich. 152. We then held that, upon the question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence, his testimony presented an issue of fact for the jury. The case has been retried, with verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and we are again asked to hold plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The record now presents much more on the subject of contributory negli gence but still leaves it a question of fact for the jury.
This is an automobile accident case. It happened upon a north and south graveled highway out in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Manistee National Bank v. SeymourMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Sanderson v. BarkmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Taylor v. Bay City Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Beaudette v. GagneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
- Rose v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ogden v. George F. Alger Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Filter v. MohrMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- United Employers Casualty Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Farrell v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. BrannamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.