Legal Opinion

Galigher v. Jones

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 21, 1889No. 75PublishedCited by 123 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. The case is stated'in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beadley

This is a suit brought by Jones, a stock-broker, against his customer, for the balance of account alleged to be due to the plaintiff arising out of advances of money and purchases and sales made, and commissions. The complaint, or declaration, states “that between the 15th day of January, 1877, and 15th day of January, 1879, the plaintiff, as a stock-broker, at the special instance and request of the defendant,' paid and advanced on an open account current, to and for the use of the defendant, divers sums of money, and also earned at the defendant’s request, and became entitled to, divers…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Markham v. . JaudonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Baker v. . DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Wright v. . Bank of the MetropolisNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Gruman v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Baker v. . DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. Oscar Gruss & Son, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Yossie Hollander, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Miga v. JensenTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Advest, Inc. v. Patrick McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API