Legal Opinion

Fenton v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 26, 1987No. WCB 84-02176; CA A40730PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*80VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order which affirmed the referee’s decision that claimant’s cervical injury was not compensable. On de novo review, ORS 656.298, we reverse.

On February 2,1982, claimant sustained a compensa-ble injury to her back. She worked until February 8, when she took time off because of severe pain. She returned to work on March 1 and suffered an increase in symptoms by April 7. Her condition required further medical treatment and time loss. She was treated by Dr. Rabin and Dr. Bert. On May 3, while on her way to see Rabin for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Centex Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. Moreau v. Zayre Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Bettasso v. Snow-Hill Coal Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Williams v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Wood v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lee v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Excel Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Font v. New York City Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Hicks v. Spectra PhysicsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Joplin v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API