Legal Opinion
In re Sharood Shoe Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 17, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In the matter of the Sharood Shoe Corporation, bankrupt. On review of an order disallowing a claim of Lindeke, Wiarner & Sons.
1Opinion of the Court
WILLARD, District Judge.
This is a review of an order made by the referee on October 14, 1911, disallowing the claim of Lindeke, Warner & Sons.
Some time in August, 1910, Lindeke, Warner & Sons with others signed the following agreement:
“The undersigned agree with each other to loan .to the Sharood Shoe Corporation the sums of moneys set opposite their respective signatures', on the following terms:
“Said loans shall bear interest at six per cent, per annum and shall he payable on or- before' six months.
“In the payment of such loans there shall be no preference between the undersigned and when…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Bissell v. Michigan Southern & Northern Indiana Railroad CompaniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Chubb v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re LathrapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Sherman v. Pepin Pickling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Midland Truck Lines, Inc. v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Salt Lake Automobile Co. v. Keith-O'Brien Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1914
- Heller Investment Co. v. Southern Title & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936