Legal Opinion
In Re Lathrap
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1932No. 6742PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is prosecuted from an order of the District Court, confirming an order of the referee, in which latter order the appellants were held to be eoadventurers and coinvestors with the bankrupt, and their claims adjudged subordinate to those of creditors.
The bankrupt, Prank H. Lathrap, is the lessee of a certain parcel of real property; under an oil and gas lease in the ordinary form, giving him the right to prospect upon the property and produce oil therefrom. Pursuant to a permit issued by the Department of Investment, Division of Corporations, of the State of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hurley v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Warren v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Continental Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
- Cecil B. De Mille Productions, Inc. v. WooleryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- In Re San Francisco Bay ExpositionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1943
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.