Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Pepin Pickling Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1950No. 35,012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Action by a preferred stockholder of defendant corporation, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover the par value of 33 shares of cumulative preferred stock of $100 par value and accumulated dividends at seven percent per annum. The defense was that, pursuant to statutes in force when the stock was issued and when defendant subsequently amended its articles "of incorporation, defendant by such an amendment cancelled not only the stock held by plaintiff by issuing in lieu thereof new preferred stock having a par value of $70 per share and entitled to dividends at…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Davison v. Parke, Austin & Lipscomb, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. McQuillen v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1939
  5. Lonsdale, C., Corp. v. International, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farmers Bank & Capital Trust Company v. HuletteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  2. Murphy v. Country House, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Edith Honigman, Individually and on Behalf of All Class B Stockholders of the Green Giant Company v. Green Giant Company, a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  4. Donohue v. HeuserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  5. Whetstone v. Hossfeld Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API