Legal Opinion
Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. State Ex Rel. Allen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 12, 1982No. 81-305PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, Justice.
Respondent Archer Daniels Midland Company (“ADM”) brought an action for declaratory judgment seeking to have a portion of Minn.Stat. § 296.02, subd. 7 (1980) (“the Act”) declared unconstitutional. ADM alleged that the Act discriminates against interstate commerce by providing a tax reduction only for gasohol blended with alcohol distilled in Minnesota from Minnesota farm products (“Minnesota gasohol”). Upon a motion for summary judgment the district court held that a portion of the Act was unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause because it discriminates against interstate…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Chapman v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Giant Industries Arizona, Inc. v. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.