Legal Opinion

Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 20, 1984No. 83SA23PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUBOFSKY, Justice.

Archer Daniels Midland Company, the plaintiff, appeals a Denver District Court ruling upholding the constitutionality of section 39-27-102(l)(a)(III), 16B C.R.S. (1982), which provides for a five cent per gallon sales tax reduction on certain gasohol containing at least ten percent alcohol derived from agricultural and forest prod*180ucts.1 The tax reduction is limited to gasohol “produced from no more than three million gallons of alcohol annually from each facility having a design production capacity of seventeen million gallons or less per year of such alcohol.” Section…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Div. of Alcoholic Bev. v. McKesson Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Riverton Produce Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. United States Transmission Systems, Inc. v. Board of Assessment AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Colorado Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. Pueblo CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API