Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 2002No. C5-02-245PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice.

Individual taxpayers subject to the Minnesota alternative minimum tax (AMT) are permitted a charitable contribution deduction if the contribution is made “to or for the use of’ a charitable organization “located in and carrying on substantially all of its activities in the [State of Minnesota].” Minn.Stat. §§ 290.091, subd. 2(f), and 290.21, subd. 3(b) (1994). In this case, we are asked to determine whether rela-tors’ contributions to a Massachusetts donor-advised charitable gift fund qualified for deduction under Minnesota’s AMT provisions and, if not,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Maine v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Deegan v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Hutchinson Technology, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Bond v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API