Chapman v. Commissioner of Revenue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice.
Individual taxpayers subject to the Minnesota alternative minimum tax (AMT) are permitted a charitable contribution deduction if the contribution is made “to or for the use of’ a charitable organization “located in and carrying on substantially all of its activities in the [State of Minnesota].” Minn.Stat. §§ 290.091, subd. 2(f), and 290.21, subd. 3(b) (1994). In this case, we are asked to determine whether rela-tors’ contributions to a Massachusetts donor-advised charitable gift fund qualified for deduction under Minnesota’s AMT provisions and, if not,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Maine v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Deegan v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Hutchinson Technology, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Bond v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.