Legal Opinion
Zetino v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 30, 2010No. 08-70390PublishedCited by 603 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on February 18, 2010, and reported at 596 F.3d 517, is amended. The amended opinion filed concurrently with this order is substituted in its place.
With the filing of the amended opinion, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Tallman has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Hall and Lawson so recommend. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of this court has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35(f).
T…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by603 opinions
- Raul Barajas-Romero v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Angov v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Vahora v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Jagtar Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- J-J-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2020
598 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.