Legal Opinion

J-J-G

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2020No. ID 3981PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

27 I&N Dec. 808

(BIA 2020) Interim Decision #3981 Matter of J-J-G-, Respondent Decided March 31, 2020 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) The exceptional and extremely unusual hardship for cancellation of removal is based on a cumulative consideration of all hardship factors, but to the extent that a claim is based on the health of a qualifying relative, an applicant needs to establish that the relative has a serious medical condition and, if he or she is accompanying the applicant to the country of removal, that adequate…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Zetino v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. M-E-V-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
  3. Wilfredo Reyes v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Delgado-Ortiz v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tacuri-Tacuri v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  2. Miguel Moctezuma-Reyes v. Merrick B. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  3. Situ Wilkinson v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
  4. Domingo-Mendez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
  5. Duarte De Martinez v. BondiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API