Raul Barajas-Romero v. Loretta E. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINFELD, Senior Circuit Judge:
We address the “principal reason” standard for withholding of removal, and also the acquiescence and relocation standards for Convention Against Torture relief. At issue is why Raul Barajas-Romero was tortured and whether he can be returned to Mexico without likely being tortured again.
I. Facts.
Barajas-Romero came to the United States legally from Mexico as a little boy. He grew up in San Pedro, California. His mother, brothers, children, and grandchildren are American citizens, but he never became naturalized, and he remains a citizen of Mexico.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Zetino v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by259 opinions
- L-E-ABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
- Sontos Diaz-Reynoso v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Silvia Ayala v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Lucero Xochihua-Jaimes v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Nelson Quinteros v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
254 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.