Legal Opinion

Raul Barajas-Romero v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 18, 2017No. 13-70520PublishedCited by 259 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINFELD, Senior Circuit Judge:

We address the “principal reason” standard for withholding of removal, and also the acquiescence and relocation standards for Convention Against Torture relief. At issue is why Raul Barajas-Romero was tortured and whether he can be returned to Mexico without likely being tortured again.

I. Facts.

Barajas-Romero came to the United States legally from Mexico as a little boy. He grew up in San Pedro, California. His mother, brothers, children, and grandchildren are American citizens, but he never became naturalized, and he remains a citizen of Mexico.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Zetino v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by259 opinions

  1. L-E-ABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
  2. Sontos Diaz-Reynoso v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Silvia Ayala v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Lucero Xochihua-Jaimes v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Nelson Quinteros v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019

254 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API