Legal Opinion
Angov v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 4, 2013No. 07-74963PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Chief Judge THOMAS.
ORDER
The opinion and dissent filed on December 4, 2013, and published at 736 F.3d 1263, are hereby withdrawn and replaced by the amended opinion and dissent filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Judges Kozinski and Trott have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing, Judge Kozinski has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Trott has so recommended. Chief Judge Thomas has voted to grant the petition for panel rehéaring and the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Saravia v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Carlos Bringas-Rodriguez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Rivera-Corraliza v. Puig-MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Pavittar Singh v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Willie Goffney, Jr. v. Xavier BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.