Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kilburn v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1982No. 81-1562PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The critical consideration in this case is whether the record contains some evidence which supports the commission’s factual determination that the water department’s principal business is not building and other construction or demolition work, thus rendering IC-3-11.03(A) inapplicable to the facts at bar.

Specifically, the pertinent language of IC-3-01.01 provides:

“Employers not engaged in building and other construction or demolition work as their principal business and having regularly assigned employees performing work covered by the provisions of this code shall not be considered within…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. G F Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Dodson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. W.R. Co. v. North Carolina Property Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Paragon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Nye v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Hudson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Parks v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API