Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Parks v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1999No. 95-2376PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

Appellant Parks contends that the city violated Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-5-23(E)(l) and (2), regulations for “electric utility and clearance tree-trimming industries.” 1 These are specific safety regulations for acts *24that cannot practicably be performed indoors. In applying “workshop and factory” safeguards in other cases, this court has implied that Ohio Adm.Code Chapter 4121:1-5 governs only indoor activities. The issue before us in this case is whether the protections afforded by Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-5-23(E)(l) and (2) also extend to outdoor industrial injury. For the reasons that follow, we…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Johnson's Markets, Inc. v. New Carlisle Department of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Lamp v. J.A. Croson Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State ex rel. Double v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cassens Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
  2. State ex rel. Byington Builders, Ltd. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State ex rel. Mignella v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State ex rel. Devore Roofing & Painting v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. Johnson v. Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API