State ex rel. Parks v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
Appellant Parks contends that the city violated Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-5-23(E)(l) and (2), regulations for “electric utility and clearance tree-trimming industries.” 1 These are specific safety regulations for acts *24that cannot practicably be performed indoors. In applying “workshop and factory” safeguards in other cases, this court has implied that Ohio Adm.Code Chapter 4121:1-5 governs only indoor activities. The issue before us in this case is whether the protections afforded by Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-5-23(E)(l) and (2) also extend to outdoor industrial injury. For the reasons that follow, we…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Johnson's Markets, Inc. v. New Carlisle Department of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Lamp v. J.A. Croson Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948
- State ex rel. Double v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. Cassens Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
- State ex rel. Byington Builders, Ltd. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Mignella v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- State ex rel. Devore Roofing & Painting v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.