Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Nye v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1986No. 85-544PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

The district hearing officer terminated appellee’s temporary total disability benefits based upon his conclusion that appellee was engaged in “substantially gainful remunerative employment.” The court of appeals allowed the writ herein citing several reasons.

*77First, the court of appeals determined that the commission’s orders were not in compliance with the rule set forth in State, ex rel. Mitchell, v. Robbins & Myers, Inc. (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 481, 483-484, that “* * * district hearing officers, as well as regional boards of review and the Industrial Commission, must specifically state which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. G F Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Hudson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. CommOhio Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Frigidaire Division v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Johnson v. Rawac Plating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Parma Community Gen. Hosp. v. JankowskiOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Blabac v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API