Harmony Gold U.S.A., Inc. v. Cnty. of L. A.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtRothschild, P. J.
*824This appeal requires us to consider two Revenue and Taxation Code1 sections that address a real property's "base-year value" (base value), a core metric for assessing property taxes in California. Specifically, we must consider the interplay between section 51.5, subdivision (a), which removes any otherwise applicable time limits on the assessor's ability to correct base value errors that do not involve an exercise of judgment (so-called "nonjudgmental error"), and section 80, subdivision (a)(5), which limits the years for which a property owner is entitled to have a property's base value…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.California Supreme Court · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Prang v. L.A. County Assessment Appeals Bd. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2020