Legal Opinion

Gray v. Robinson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1893No. Civil No. 330PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and' for the County of Maricopa. Joseph H. Kibbey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

On December 4th, William H. Robinson entered into a written contract with John W. Thomas and D. C. Clarahan, the terms of which contract were substantially as follows: Robinson agreed to furnish land, water for the irrigation thereof, and seed for the growing of crops of barley and wheat thereon during the season of 1890. Thomas and Clarahan agreed to construct the necessary irrigating ditches on said land, to sow, irrigate, and otherwise tend and care for said crops of barley and wheat until maturity, and then at the proper season to harvest thresh, dean, and sack all the grain produced by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brewster v. . SillimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Pope v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  3. Lambert v. McFarlandNevada Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Wentworth & Osborn v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Carson v. ApplegarthNevada Supreme Court · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Myers v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. ABCDW LLC v. BanningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. Consolidated National Bank v. CunninghamArizona Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API