Lambert v. McFarland
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment rendered by the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Hon. S. H. Wright presiding. W. C. Wallace, for appellants, made the points that the judgment was not in conformity to the relief sought in the complaint, to wit: the return of the property and damages for the taking and detention. And also that a number of the instructions given were erroneous. The instructions were not passed on by the Court, and are therefore not noticed more fully here.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Lewis, C. J., Beatty, J., concurring.
Replevin to recover one hundred and twenty-eight head of cattle, particularly described in the complaint, together with • the sum of one thousand dollars damages, which the plaintiff alleges he suffered by the wrongful taking and withholding of his cattle by the defendants. The record shows that the cattle were not delivered to the plaintiff by the Sheriff, but continued in the possession of the defendants, and were under his control at the time of the trial.
The jury found the following verdict in favor of the plaintiff: “ We the jury in the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Buckley v. BuckleyNevada Supreme Court · 1877
- Godfrey v. GilsdorfNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Gray v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1893
- Consolidated National Bank v. CunninghamArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Carson v. ApplegarthNevada Supreme Court · 1870
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.