Legal Opinion

Robert C. Woofter v. Vernon E. Carlson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 9, 1967No. Patent Appeal 7496PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant prosecutes this appeal from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to appellee. The applications involved in the interference are:(a) Woofter’s application S.N. 426,118 filed April 28, 1954, and(b) Carlson’s application S.N. 475,733 filed December 16, 1954.

The subject matter of the interference is a sheet metal electrical connector, or terminal, illustratively shown in Figs. 3 and 4 of its Woofter application as follows:

The connector includes a female portion formed by the side wings 30 and 31 which are reversely bent upon themselves to place…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Metallizing Engineering Co. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Woodbridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Mason v. HepburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Apotex Usa, Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Frank E. Paulik and Robert G. Schultz v. Nabil Rizkalla and Charles N. WinnickCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. In re SmytheCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  4. Monsanto Company v. Rohm and Haas CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Young v. DworkinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API