Legal Opinion

Woodbridge v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 12, 1923No. 51PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

This suit in the Court of Claims was brought under the authority of a special act of Congress of March 2, 1901, 31 Stat. 1788, by which the claim of William E. Wood-bridge, for compensation from the United States for use of his alleged invention relating to projectiles for rifled cannon, for which a patent was ordered issued by the Government, was referred to the Court of Claims to hear and determine, first, whether Woodbridge was the first and original inventor, and, second, to what extent the United States had used it and the amount of compensation which was due in equity and justice…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  5. Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Metallizing Engineering Co. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Special Equipment Co. v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. In Re Stephen B. Bogese IICourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. Bull v. Logetronics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API