Apotex Usa, Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Apotex USA, Inc. appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granting Merck & Co., Inc.’s motion for summary judgment that the claims of U.S. Patents 5,573,780 and 5,690,962 are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(g). Apotex Corp. v. Merck, & Co., No. 96-C-7375, 2000 WL 97,582 (N.D.Ill. Jan.25, 2000) (“Apotex I”). Because the district court did not err in granting summary judgment that the '780 and '962 patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(g), we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Apotex is the assignee of the '780 and '962 patents,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., Defendants-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Invitrogen Corp. (Formerly Known as Life Technologies, Inc.) v. Clontech Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Kao Corporation and the Andrew Jergens Company, Plaintiffs-Cross v. Unilever United States, Inc. And Conopco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Eolas Technologies Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Schumer v. Laboratory Computer Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.