Legal Opinion

Bialy v. Reeber

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.

Counsel moves for leave to withdraw as attorney for the defendant Blersch. He was retained on August 15, 1965 by an insurance carrier to represent the interests of the defendant. Since that time and until the action against Blersch was actually called to trial extensive time, money and effort had been expended by the insurer to locate the defendant, without *774success. Blersch is apparently still missing and for that reason this motion has been made. The practical motivation is stated to be the urgent necessity that Blersch be present at trial, for his absence would allow little or no defense to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shalita v. American Motorists InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. Brooks v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  3. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. BlerschNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Murphy v. SolomonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Cabrera v. Atlantic National InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brothers v. BurtNew York Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API